Dig into our work.
Long engagements with regulated enterprises. Named platforms, measured outcomes, and governance that survives an audit.
The number that matters is not how many. It is how long.
Nobody hands a control environment to a supplier they are still evaluating. Each engagement below began as a defined scope and stayed — through audits, reorganisations, platform upgrades and the people who moved on.
How the ownership model works →Four engagements, described by scope.
Global insurance group
Four years of continuous identity and SAP access governance across a reinsurance estate. We hold the joiner–mover–leaver lifecycle, run the certification campaigns and maintain the segregation-of-duties ruleset — and produce the evidence each regulatory cycle asks for.
U.S. technology partner
A strategic partnership covering cloud security posture and platform operations. Shared accountability for AWS posture, cloud identity and the secure access edge, delivered to the same service levels and reporting as a directly contracted engagement.
Manufacturing SAP estate
An S/4HANA conversion carried through role redesign and segregation-of-duties remediation — then held afterwards. The ruleset, the emergency-access process and the recurring access reviews stayed with us when the project closed.
Follow-the-sun operations
Continuous coverage handed between Tokyo, Pune and the United States. Work moves west at the end of each day, so no queue waits overnight and no incident sits until a region wakes up. One service, one owner, three time zones.
We describe engagements by scope, not by name.
Customers in regulated industries do not publish their control environments, and neither do we on their behalf. What we can show is what we were accountable for.
Let’s take ownership together.
Tell us what you need done. We will tell you what we would take on.